I am watching the video from Channel 9 about the new hotmail version codenamed Kahuna. I got to the part where the question over email size was discussed. Premium users can send and receive 20 megs while normal users will be stuck with 10 megs either way.
My question is why do email providers keep sticking with small email sizes? With bandwidth constantly increasing, the free email providers still hold down the users. What really got me going was the developer who told us that email is not really the medium that large files should be sent through. Fair enough - if you are a techie. If you are Mr and Mrs Smith and are communicating with your daughter with videos; FTP sites or torrents are not easy methods of sending files. Email is the easiest and quickest method of sending files to your contacts.
I wish more developers would step outside their boxes and realize that users are crying out for larger email attachment allowances. If I had the option, I would use email to send my large files. It is so much easier than uploading to a web server and then sending the link. Why not just send the file. My “favourite” MS developer stated the SMTP gateways wouldn’t be able to handle emails which have large attachments. Tut tut. Not true. Any email server that receives a large email should immediately skip spam and virus checking as both virus and spam senders won’t bother sending large emails because it becomes difficult to email in bulk. Therefore the only work a gateway is doing is passing it onto another server or storing it in the user’s mailbox.
We aren’t sitting in the days of dial-up anymore. Bandwidth is plentiful and cheap. Let the users have what they want.
*end rant*